A common sight around British roads for nearly a century could be about to disappear, as National Car Parks (NCP) has recently entered administration. Changes in consumer behaviour and rising costs have been identified as the reasons for the debts that made administration inevitable. While redundancies are yet to take place, workers will no doubt be concerned about job security.
Below, we look at the causes for National Car Parks entering administration and how this may impact its workforce. We then discuss the considerations employers must take into account in such circumstances to maintain a healthy working environment and avoid legal risks.
If you value remaining up-to-date with all things employment, subscribe to our newsletter now. Here at the Employment Law Review, we publish regular insights from the sector to ensure you never miss an update. It only takes a moment to join, simply hit the button at the top and fill in your details.
£300m+ Debts Lead to Administration for National Car Parks
National Car Parks has been around since the 1930s. It was founded in 1931 by Colonel Frederick Lucas. Then, after several sales, it was eventually acquired by the Japanese company Park24 in 2017. Unfortunately, in March 2026, NCP entered administration with debts surpassing £300 million.
In an official document, Park24 explained that it’d been impacted by a change in consumer behaviour following the Covid-19 pandemic. There had been a “decline in demand,” with fewer drivers parking, and any recovery following the pandemic “remained subdued.”
What’s more, due to a combination of the Russia-Ukraine war and “persistently high inflation in the UK,” operating costs, including rent payments, continued to increase. PwC, the administrator, also pointed out how NCP had a number of “long-term, inflexible” leases, preventing it from closing unprofitable sites.
After determining that an “improvement in its cash‑flow position” couldn’t be identified, National Car Parks entered administration.
Like what you're reading? Don't forget to subscribe to our bi-weekly newsletter!
Providing some insight into the matters which unfolded, Premier Miton’s chair of equities, Mr Gervais Williams, explained how NCP had made an incorrect assumption. He said the sector has traditionally been viewed as a reliable fixture on the high street, yet the recent surge in online shopping has eroded demand for car‑parking spaces. He added, “It [NCP] was making assumptions that it would be able to repay its debt quite happily in good or bad years, but actually it’s just had a series of bad years…”
READ: Fifth of Job Ads Promote Basic Employment Rights as Benefits, Study Finds
NCP Workers’ Jobs in the Balance
With National Car Parks entering administration this month, around 680 jobs have been put at risk. This will raise significant concerns for all who work there. However, it’s important to note that PwC administrators have stated their intention to “ensure continuity of service” by keeping all 340 sites open. This should provide some reassurance to NCP workers, but there’s still no guarantee that redundancies won’t occur.
Redundancies: A UK Employment Law Perspective
While National Car Parks has yet to initiate redundancy measures, the risk remains. Should it decide to proceed in this way, careful consideration is required. While redundancies are sometimes necessary and can be effective in certain circumstances, how they are handled can significantly impact both the working environment and liability.
When redundancies are handled with care, caution, and transparency, it is more likely that staff feel valued and that legal obligations are met. However, when processes are rushed, employment rights may be breached, leading to legal repercussions, and staff morale could be negatively affected, impacting productivity. As such, getting redundancy procedures right is essential.
Things to Consider
Before even thinking about redundancies, it’s important to consider all other options. Taking National Car Parks, for example, while it hasn’t ruled out redundancies, it isn’t rushing to make them. Alternatives such as the sale or partial sale of a business could prevent such action, as could voluntary redundancies, offering alternative work, and more.
If a business has considered alternatives, though, and still believes redundancy is necessary, it should then ensure it undertakes a fair process. Among other things, this means following its own redundancy policy (if it has one), informing employees of the process, outlining the selection criteria, and consulting those affected. Where 20 or more redundancies have been proposed within a 90-day period, collective consultations must take place.
READ: Supporting Neurodivergent Staff Can Hugely Benefit Businesses, ACAS Says
In circumstances where an employer hasn’t complied with its legal obligations regarding redundancies, it could face unfair dismissal claims. If an employee succeeds with their case, the employer may be obligated to pay out compensation.
Yet, the risks don’t end there. The employer’s reputation could be damaged. This is especially the case if the matter were heavily publicised. Furthermore, the morale of its remaining workforce could be significantly impacted. This could lead to a decrease in productivity and performance.
As such, while employers may be under pressure to act quickly during periods of financial difficulty, taking the time to conduct a thorough and fair redundancy process is recommended. Not only can it mitigate reputational damage, but it can also avoid further financial costs through fines or performance declines.
Wrapping Up: The National Car Parks Case
NCP has been a mainstay on British roads for almost a century. But the difficulties it’s facing, highlighted most recently by it entering administration, showcase the delicate nature of business. Sometimes several correct decisions are made, and rapid growth occurs; other times, a few mistakes or market surprises lead to redundancies.
While redundancies are unfortunate, they are sometimes necessary. This doesn’t mean employers have free will over letting staff go, though. Fair and thorough procedures, in line with established employment law, are essential to ensure compliance and avoid legal repercussions. If an employer has any concerns about their own redundancy procedures, seeking specialist legal advice is recommended.
Join Our Newsletter
The Employment Law Review is always on the lookout for sector updates. We provide regular news and share the latest on employment law to ensure you remain up to date. Subscribe to our newsletter today so you never miss future insights.