On 13 March 2025, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer announced that NHS England would be abolished. Described as the “world’s largest quango,” the body, which currently oversees the healthcare service in England, will be brought under direct Labour govt control.
Starmer revealed this move during a speech in Hull, stating it would “put the NHS back at the heart of government… freeing it to focus on patients…” Below, we discuss what NHS England is and the impacts the move will have, particularly on current employees and patients.
If you enjoy reading this employment insight, make sure to subscribe to our newsletter. The Employment Law Review publishes regular updates from the sector, and subscribing is the only way to remain informed. To sign up now, simply hit the button above and fill out your details!
NHS England to be Abolished: What Does it Mean?
What is NHS England?
NHS England is the body currently responsible for overseeing the National Health Service (NHS) in England. It was established under the Health and Social Care Act 2012 and is a “quango”: a semi-public organisation funded and supported by the government but operating independently, handling specific tasks delegated to it.
READ: TUPE Transfers: What is TUPE and How Does it Work?
The organisation was created to operate outside government interference, allowing healthcare professionals to focus on service delivery while ensuring efficiency and accountability. During its operation, the body has managed NHS budgets and coordinated national programmes such as the COVID-19 vaccination rollout. Unfortunately, there’s been continued criticism about it being overly bureaucratic, creating inefficiencies, and limiting the ability of the government to implement reforms directly.
NHS England to be Scrapped
Last week, Keir Starmer announced plans to scrap what the Labour govt labelled the “world’s largest quango.” Its functions will be absorbed into the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC), showcasing an intention to centralise healthcare administration.
Like what you're reading? Don't forget to subscribe to our bi-weekly newsletter!
Some of the key factors that have influenced this decision include:
- Bureaucratic Duplication—NHS England and the DHSC currently manage various aspects of healthcare policy and funding, leading to inefficiencies.
- Cost-Cutting—With 50% of staff expected to be cut (across NHS England and DHSC), it’s been estimated that around £500 million could be saved.
- Government Accountability—By taking direct control of NHS operations, ministers will have increased responsibility for healthcare outcomes.
- Workforce Inefficiency—Under the current structure, the Labour government believes there is an excessive number of administrators rather than frontline healthcare providers.
However, while these changes may appear to be straightforward solutions, the reality is more complex. Concerns have been raised about the significant job losses, potential disruptions to NHS services, and possible politicisation of healthcare management.
NHS England to Cut Jobs
While the decision announced by Keir Starmer could save hundreds of millions of pounds, thousands of people will lose their jobs. The quango currently employs approximately 14,400 people, while the DHSC employs 3,500, so a 50% reduction would result in around 9,000 job losses.
Legal Considerations
The Labour govt will have to tread carefully if it proceeds with its decision. Under UK employment law, redundancies of 20 or more staff members require strict adherence to consultation processes and redundancy rights. Employers must:
- Provide a minimum 45 days’ consultation if 100 or more employees are being made redundant.
- Consult with a representative following a lawful collective consultation.
- Offer statutory redundancy pay to those eligible and consider alternative employment opportunities.
Potential Workforce Disruptions
Unfortunately, even if redundancies are lawfully carried out, concern remains. Ms Sharon Graham, general secretary of Unite the Union, argued that “taking an axe to these jobs is an ill-thought-out strategy.” She explained how the move could cause healthcare professionals to work less effectively, especially if they’re “forced to do additional administrative work rather than treat patients.”
But the concerns don’t stop there. The restructuring process may create uncertainty around job security and career progression, while the departure of experienced personnel could lead to significant knowledge gaps. Although the government claims this move will “empower NHS staff to deliver better care,” whether these worries will materialise remains to be seen.
Impact on Healthcare Delivery and Governance
The abolition of NHS England won’t just impact employees, though. Those concerned with the decision believe disruption that affects healthcare delivery will also arise.
The Labour govt asserts that its cost-cutting measures will release greater funding for frontline services, while the takeover of control will allow Ministers to take more decisive action on pressing healthcare issues.
However, those concerned believe a restructuring will impact operational efficiency, which will have a knock-on effect on healthcare delivery. Furthermore, since a key layer of independent scrutiny will have been removed, critics argue that decisions could become more politically driven, forgoing medical priorities. Finally, since the quango has previously organised various national healthcare initiatives, questions remain concerning how such projects will be managed going forward.
Final Thoughts
Keir Starmer’s announcement marks a major shift in the management of the UK’s healthcare system. Scrapping NHS England will bring the National Health Service under direct government control, with some for and against the move.
While the Labour govt asserts this reform will reduce bureaucracy, cut costs, and improve patient care, critics argue job losses and inefficient healthcare delivery will result. The government may have a clear commitment to streamlining NHS operations, but questions remain about whether this move will ultimately enhance efficiency or create new complexities in an already strained healthcare system.
READ: Overpayment of Wages or Rightfully Earned? Huw Edwards Refuses to Pay Back BBC Suspension Salary
As these changes unfold, it’s crucial for NHS staff, patients, and legal professionals to stay informed about their rights and the wider implications for UK healthcare. To ensure you never miss the changes as they happen, sign up for our newsletter now!
At the Employment Law Review, we seek out breaking news so you don’t have to. By signing up, you will receive regular insights into the employment sector, helping you stay ahead and compliant. To subscribe now, simply hit the button at the top and fill out your details.